It’s 2 PM on a warm Sunday afternoon in a deli-style
restaurant in Denver’s hip, upscale LoDo neighborhood. Even though this time of
day typically sees a lull in customers, The Market is just as busy as ever. The
restaurant is structured into two main parts- a lower level, where the front
door is located, that has a counter that only serves coffee and pastries, and
an upper level where customers can order from a plethora of sandwich, soup, and
salad options, each type of food being at a separate counter. There are only a
few small tables in the lower level, with most of the seating being around the
deli counter. The people inside aren’t the only thing that makes the restaurant
busy- the décor includes shelves lining the walls, filled with bottles and
packages of old-time foods and seasonings. Much of the space not occupied by
food counters, soda fountains, or silverware stations has racks of products for
sale- candy, tea, and other odds and ends. At first glance, this eatery seems
fairly typical, but further analysis of the people, food, and atmosphere leads
to a broader observation about food values and culture.
The majority of the people that come in to the lower part of
the restaurant to go to the coffee counter are alone or with one other person,
and an overwhelming majority of them take their coffee to go, spending minimal
time inside the restaurant and instead getting their caffeine fix to go and
moving on with their day. This reflects the rather obvious value that people
place on convenience. Being able to grab a cup of good coffee on their way
somewhere else is obviously a common value of The Market’s clientele, based on
the line at the coffee counter that doesn’t ever get any shorter. The more
interesting observations, though, lie in the upper part of the restaurant. More
people here are sitting down and eating their food, and the majority of them
are couples, groups of friends, or families. The most noteworthy thing about
it, though, is the feel of the restaurant as a whole. The customers, employees,
and atmosphere come together to create a very cozy, casual, local-feeling
environment. This is present in the customers because through careful
observation, it appears that almost everyone coming in is familiar with the
place, or if they aren’t, they are with a person who is. In fact, a friend of
mine who lives a few blocks away came with me on this day, and she was new to
The Market. She said that the ordering system was very confusing –a person orders
at one counter, and then meets their food and cashier at another- and had I not
been there with her, she wouldn’t have known what to do. Most people linger
after their meals, too, talking with their friends and perhaps sipping a cup of
coffee they’ve gone to the lower counter to obtain. The employees also reflect
the value of community, because all of them seem to be very close, chatting and
laughing behind the counter, and not taking their job too seriously. Several
employees recognize each other, providing further proof of the existence of
regular customers. All the employees are friendly and talkative with the
customers, as well. The nature of the restaurant itself lends itself to this
idea, too. Most of the products for sale are natural, organic, and most
importantly, local. There’s a large emphasis on the fact that the honey,
chocolate, or teas on display come from Colorado. Historical photos of Downtown
Denver cover the walls. Furthermore, directly above the silverware, where
anyone grabbing a fork would be bound to see it, is an odd decoration- an
obituary. Framed and prominently displayed, this obituary tells of the life and
passing of the founder of The Market. This signifies the close connection that
the small business still has with its owner, and that his passing is something
customers would be interested in, too.
All of these observations come together to form a conclusion
about what the residents of Lower Downtown Denver value about the places they
eat, and that’s an emphasis on community. The casual, low-key vibe of the
restaurant, coupled with its obvious roots in Denver’s history and the fact
that almost all customers seem to be repeats or regulars support this
statement. There’s a value placed on authenticity, which is consistent with
what one would probably expect from the residents of this area. A mostly young
crowd that can accurately be described as hipsters are the people who mainly
populate LoDo, and the values of family-owned and local are ones that resonate
with them. But it’s important to note that the Market isn’t high-brow in any
way; although it may have organic, local products and a customer base that
values such things, it’s affordable and casual. Maybe, then, the authenticity
of The Market that appeals to people is the kind that Freedman and Jurafsky
posit in their potato chip analysis. “For the working class, authenticity is
rooted in historicity, including family tradition, the model of a company as a
family business with an explicit founder, and regional American locations”
(Freedman and Jurafsky 52). This model seems to fit The Market fairly well-
there is definitely an emphasis on Denver history and that of the restaurant
itself, including its founder. The class distinctions fit fairly well, too, as
the young clientele eating at an affordable deli would probably fall into the
middle or working class. Why, exactly, do people value authenticity? In an
interesting paper on the authenticity of food by Glenn Carroll and Dennis
Wheaton, they postulate 3 main reasons:
“First, fascination with authentic products made by
traditional methods might reflect a reaction against the perceived loss of a
personalized self in contemporary mass society, in its production techniques
and its corporate organizations… Second, individuals may be engaging in self-
expression in purchasing the products of small, obscure producers who are not
widely known… Third, individuals may be using authenticity as a forum for
status generation” (Carroll and Wheaton 12). When these motivations are compared
to the clients of The Market, it actually makes a lot of sense. As previously
established, the young, hipster crowd are the primary consumers of food in
LoDo. Self-expression and the rejection of corporations are known principles of
this type of people, and they go hand in hand with eating at a family-owned,
local restaurant such as the one examined in this paper. All of the
observations and inferences here lead to the acceptance of the conclusion that
in the community of the younger, more hip part of Downtown Denver place high
value on community, authenticity, and local origins in their food.
Sources
Carroll, Glenn R., and Dennis
Ray Wheaton. "The Organizational Construction of Authenticity: An
Examination of Contemporary Food and Dining in the U.S." Research in Organizational
Behavior (2009): 1-78.
Freedman,
Joshua, and Dan Jurafsky. "Authenticity in America: Class Distinctions in
Potato Chip Advertising." Gastronomica: The Journal of Food and Culture
11.4 (2012): 46-54.
I found your observations about how the two levels of the restaurant separated the tow types of customers and how that lent to the overall feel of the place.
ReplyDeleteYour use of the Freedman and Jurafsky article helps to make your point more clear and is placed well. The other source you used seemed a little bit out of place and could be worth looking at moving somewhere else in the paper.
You make an interesting point about the food values of the downtown restaurant going population, the emphasis on food which is well supported by your content. However I would revised the portion where you introduce the idea of a hip crowd "hipsters" and make it more clear what their place is and how they are significant to the overall meaning of your paper.
The introduction paragraph did a great job of making we want to read more about your topic. I think a narrative is a strong opener, however the transition from the first paragraph to the second seems a little clunky and is worth revising.
1) I thought it was interesting how much a a "local" place this is. It makes it seem very up-beat and convenient for the customers. My first thought was the Central Perk from Friends.
ReplyDelete2) Your source worked well with what your observations were claims, which was good. I thought your main quote was a great way to connect everything you had been talking about until that point.
3) I was unsure exactly what conclusion you were trying to make, however, there were a couple that you could choose to narrow down on, which works in your favor.
4) I really enjoyed your observations and the post in general. Maybe try to make it more smooth with what you are trying to get across.